Compare
How Lookful compares, honestly.
Website teams usually reach for one of four kinds of tool. Each is good at something. Here’s what they do, where Lookful is different, and when another tool is the better choice.
At a glance.
Categories, not single products: tools within a category differ, so “varies” means some do and some don’t. Prices are as published on vendors’ own sites when we checked in November 2026.
| Capability | Lookful | Overlays | Browser extensions | Monitoring platforms | Consent platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How it works | Scans your pages from outside; nothing installed | A script added to your site | Runs in your browser, one page at a time | Crawls your site on a schedule | A consent script on your site, plus a cookie scanner |
| Automated WCAG rules | axe-core 4.14, WCAG 2.2 A and AA | Some add a scanner | Yes | Yes | No |
| Keyboard, clicks, hover, menus and dialogs tested | Automatically, on every page | No | By hand, or guided tests in paid tiers | Varies | No |
| AI review for judgment calls | Labelled “needs review”, never scored | AI changes the page instead | In some paid tiers | Varies | No |
| Tracking before and after consent | Before any choice, after accept, after reject | No | No | Some include privacy scans | Scans for cookies and trackers |
| Blocks trackers until consent | No. It tests whether your setup does | No | No | No | Yes, that’s their job |
| Fixes explained in your code | Fix plans with steps and code | Patches the page in the visitor’s browser | Per issue | Yes | Consent setup only |
| Monitoring and history | Weekly or monthly, new and resolved counted | Varies | No | Yes | Scheduled cookie scans |
| Published price | $49 per site per month | From $490 a year (accessiBe, UserWay) | Free; paid tiers on request | Mostly on request; Pope Tech from $25 a month | Cookiebot from about €15 per domain a month; OneTrust on request |
✓ yes · ◐ partly or varies · — no. The words carry the meaning.
01
Accessibility overlays
For example accessiBe (accessWidget), UserWay, EqualWeb. AudioEye combines automated fixes with monitoring and expert services.
An overlay is a script you add to your site. It shows visitors a panel of display settings and tries to repair problems automatically, in the visitor’s browser, while the page loads.
The trouble is that the problems stay in your code. In January 2025 the FTC announced an order requiring accessiBe to pay $1 million, alleging that its claims that its AI tool could make any website WCAG compliant were false, misleading or unsubstantiated. The order, finalized in April 2025, bars it from making such claims without evidence. More than 1,000 people and organizations in accessibility have signed the Overlay Fact Sheet, which says overlays can’t make a site conformant and can interfere with the screen readers and other tools disabled people already use. UsableNet, an accessibility vendor, counted 1,023 companies with a widget on their site among those sued over digital accessibility in 2024.
Where Lookful is different
- Nothing is added to your site
- Finds the problem in your code and explains the fix
- Flags overlays it finds on your site
- Never says your site is compliant
If you already use one
Lookful scans the site as visitors get it, overlay and all, so you can see what’s still wrong underneath. Fix plans never recommend runtime patching.
02
Free browser extensions
For example WAVE (WebAIM) and axe DevTools (Deque).
Excellent, free and the right tool for developers checking the page in front of them. They run automated checks on one page at a time, in your browser, and help you test by hand.
Where Lookful is different
- Many pages and many sites, without opening each one
- Keyboard, interaction, menu and dialog tests run for you
- Cookie and consent testing
- History, scores and reports to share with people who don’t use DevTools
Use them together
Keep an extension in your developers’ browsers to check fixes as they work, and Lookful to watch the whole site and report progress.
03
Monitoring platforms
For example Siteimprove, Level Access, Deque axe Monitor, Silktide, Pope Tech.
Platforms that crawl whole sites on a schedule, often alongside SEO, content quality, analytics or expert audit services. Most quote on request, and they suit large organizations with many pages and an accessibility team.
Where Lookful is different
- Fewer pages, tested more deeply: interaction, keyboard, dialogs and consent on every page
- Accessibility and privacy in one scan and one score
- A published price per site, with a free trial
- Fix plans and an accessibility statement included
When a platform fits better
If you need to crawl thousands of pages, want SEO and content governance in the same tool, or need expert manual audits, a platform or an accessibility consultancy is the better fit. Lookful checks up to 10 key pages per site.
04
Consent management platforms
For example Cookiebot (Usercentrics) and OneTrust.
A consent platform shows your cookie banner, records choices and blocks trackers until a visitor agrees. Its scanner lists the cookies your site sets. You need one if your site uses tracking.
Lookful doesn’t replace it. It checks that it works: it loads each page as a new visitor, then after accept and after reject, each in a fresh browser, and reports tracking that starts before a choice or keeps going after a reject. It also compares the trackers it sees with your privacy policy.
Use them together
Your consent platform manages consent; Lookful verifies the result, the way a regulator or a curious visitor would see it, alongside your accessibility results.
Benchmark: the GOV.UK accessibility test pages.
The UK Government Digital Service built pages with 142 accessibility barriers on purpose and published how well automated tools found them. We ran Lookful on the same pages in November 2026.
- Lookful
- 47.9%
- 68 of 142
- axe-core 4.14 alone
- 25.4%
- Default rules, same pages
- Best single tool, 2018
- 40%
- SortSite
- All 13 tools, 2018
- 70%
- Combined
Of the 68 barriers Lookful found, 36 are also found by axe-core on its own. The other 32 came from Lookful’s own tests: 15 from the interaction engine, 14 from AI review, 2 from the keyboard test and 1 from the WCAG 2.2 target-size rule.
How we measured
- Each test page scanned on its own, the way a customer’s pages are
- A barrier counts as found when a confirmed issue or a “needs review” finding matches it, judged by hand
- The 2018 figures are GDS’s published results, not a re-test of those tools today
- Today’s axe-core scores lower than axe did in 2018 partly because some rules were retired
A benchmark of deliberate barriers isn’t a real site, and finding barriers isn’t the same as making a site accessible. It is a fair, public way to compare what tools catch.
Sources
- FTC: order requires accessiBe to pay $1 million (January 3, 2025) and final order (April 22, 2025)
- Overlay Fact Sheet
- UsableNet, 2024 year-end digital accessibility lawsuit report
- GDS accessibility tool audit (updated April 2018)
- Vendor pricing pages: accessiBe, UserWay, Pope Tech, Cookiebot (checked November 2026)
Product names are trademarks of their owners. Descriptions are our summary of public information; tell us if something has changed.
See what your site’s visitors run into.
Free for 14 days on one site. No card, nothing to install.